[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
blot_diameter
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
blot_diameter |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:00:06 +0100 (CET) |
Hi!
According to the recent discussion about blot_diameter, I tried to fix
all font symbols that I contributed so far. Still, I do not fully
understand the concept. Does blot_diameter only apply to convex
edges? Does it only apply to the outline of a symbol? Does the
concept of blot_diameter imply that lines always must have a width of
at least blot_diameter? What about penrazors, penstrokes and all the
other MetaFont constructs that typically produce sharp edges?
Anyway, while fixing the font, I also added some more characters to
the vaticana style note heads section -- most of them for
compatibility reasons with OpusTeX and commercial systems. Thereby I
noticed that Lily does not like TeX fonts that contain more than 256
characters:
lilypond: ../flower/include/array.hh:149: int &
Array<int>::elem_ref(int) const: Assertion `i >=0&&i<size_' failed.
This happens as soon as starting to prepocess notehead elements.
Therefore I have currently commented out some of the new note heads in
feta-bolletjes.mf.
Here is a summary of the changes:
* Fixed some blot_diameter related flaws in some feta symbols
* Added some more vaticana/solesmes style font symbols
* Bugfix: renamed subbipunctum -> inclinatum
* Fixed a few typos in various .mf files
The attached patch is relative to my previous patch. When applying to
original 1.5.28, the only conflict (if at all) should occur for
ancient-font.ly. In this case, just drop the changes for this file
(it affects just a single line, anyway).
Greetings,
Juergen
patch_1.5.28.NEW.1.diff
Description: Text document
- blot_diameter,
Juergen Reuter <=