[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ledger lines
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ledger lines |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:42:28 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> >
> > yes -- but I could not find a direction for the whole, grob, so the
> > stem- prefix looks superfluous.
> >
>
> Mmh, well, yes. The porrectus itself just has no direction.
the probem is that we get a confusing tangle of properties if we
give them exact names. We'd get 20 different sorts of directions. I
think it is better to reduce the number of variable names.
> > The patch looks good. I'm putting it in.
>
> Thanks. Actually, I already feared that it still would be (at least
> partially) rejected, since it still does not solve all problems...
.. I forgot the exact reason why I rejected the last one, but this
one looks as if it will improve the general state of lily, so that's
not too bad.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- [PATCH] ledger lines, Juergen Reuter, 2002/03/25
- [PATCH] ledger lines, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/03/25
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, Juergen Reuter, 2002/03/25
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/03/26
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, Juergen Reuter, 2002/03/28
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/03/28
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/03/28
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, Laura Conrad, 2002/03/28
- Re: [PATCH] ledger lines, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/03/28
Re: ledger lines, Rune Zedeler, 2002/03/26
Re: ledger lines, Rune Zedeler, 2002/03/26
[PATCH] ledger lines, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/03/26