[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:30:24 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > address@hidden writes:
> >
> > > So, why not double the number of markings, by matching, for example, ^(
> > > with ^) and _( with _), while for -( -) there would be attached a flag
> > > which attaches it to the "upper" or "lower" marking group. This could be a
> >
> > because it is inconsistent: _ and ^ are only used for layout
> > overrides, not to change musical meaning.
>
> I agree. But, what about ^\startGroup ... ^\endGroup? Those analyse
> brackets are not music and they should be free from musical context.
Yes, but they do form content, while _ and ^ are layout.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen