Re: scheme accessors

[Nicolas Sceaux]

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:17:10 +0100, Han-Wen a dit : 

 > address@hidden writes:
 >> 
 >> I had a cold sweat when running the new 2.1.26, but then read:
 >> "The naming of exported Scheme functions now follows Scheme conventions."
 >> Ouf.
 >> 
 >> This is just a suggestion:
 >> It may be more idiomatic to define a setter for accessors. For
 >> instance, given the reader ly:music-property and the writer
 >> ly:music-set-property!:
 >> 
 >> (define-public ly:music-property
 >> (make-procedure-with-setter ly:music-property
 >> ly:music-set-property!))
 >> 
 >> you can then use ly:music-property to access the property as before,
 >> but you can also use it with set!:

 > Can I ask for a patch?

ok I'm working on it.

nicolas