Re: .ly: procedural vs. declarative (was: RFC)

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> I would recommend that we would state that the declarative part of LilyPond is
> already in a rather mature state. It is the instructive part which is under
> active developement. You may typeset loosely without compromises, but in order

Not entirely  true; for the basics, the declarative is there, but
things like trills, articulations, etc. are missing. They are mainly 
implemented as print instructions (ie. "print this symbol"). 

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen