lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boosting internalization


From: Heikki Johannes Junes
Subject: Re: Boosting internalization
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:27:19 +0200 (EET)
User-agent: HUT webmail, IMP 2.2.6

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:20:26 +0100 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > > > Could the translations, with instructions how to update, be
> included
> > > > in Program
> > > > Reference? This would boost the internationalization.
> > > 
> > > I think this is material for "how does lily work" document, which
> IIRC
> > > was last seen living in the hands of Carl Sorensen (I believe). Can
> > > you try to make the info appear there?
> > 
> > :) Good answer, though my question was a bit different, I guess.
> > 
> > I meant that the po-files become outdated without being noticed. An
> html-page
> > which would collect the translations would make it easier to update
> the
> > translations.
> 
> you mean
> 
>   http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?domain=lilypond
> 
> 
> This gets updated when someone sits down and submits the url for a new
> release to the translation robot. Do you want to  volunteer? It's only
> a small effort.

It's great that the robot is there. But the following translations, which are in
po/ -directory, are not in the robot:

cs.po
fi.po
it.po
ru.po

Should the robot and CVS-tree be all the time synchronized? Or, in the other
extreme case, should the translations be at all in the source tree, but only in
the robot?

-- 
Terveisin
Heikki Junes




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]