lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog mf/feta-eindelijk.mf mf/fe...


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog mf/feta-eindelijk.mf mf/fe...
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 14:20:03 +0100

address@hidden writes:
> > >   Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion.
> > 
> > Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
> > the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex.  Am I missing
> > something?
> 
> Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages are obvious:
> Exact generation of the music glyphs, no need for mftrace.
> Additionally, the conversion will be around 10times faster.  We still
> need fontforge for removing overlaps[1] and adding hints, though.

OK -- This will be great; However, I suppose we will still need some
glue scripting, though. Also, I have the impression (not sure, though)
that the parmesan files will need a lot more work, since they use
shaped pens. Have you investigated that?  I am not too fond of
requiring two parallel mechanisms for creating Type1 fonts
simultaneously.

-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]