[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:18:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Trying to build 2.4CVS with tetex-2.0
>
> Almost everything works, but feta outline fonts are not found:
This is quite strange, as all tetex-3.0/2.0 changes should have
been compatibility features.
Can you try the usual path of finding out why this fails
* check TEXMF
* what file is not found (the lilypond.map, or the feta font)
* check TEXMF
* use kpsewhich to locate the file
* check TEXMF
* check if texmf.cnf is really the tetex-2.x one
* check TEXMF
* check if lilypond is linked against tetex-2.x (libkpathsea3)
etc.
The tex, map and font files are searched in different directory trees
for tetex-2.0 and tetex-3.0. The intricacies can be found quite
easily by looking at texmf.cnf, and playing with kpsewich.
> Invoking `dvips -Ppdf -u+ec-mftrace.map -u+lilypond.map -E -o
> lily-1009715145.ep
> s lily-1009715145'This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye
> Software (ww
> w.radicaleye.com)
> ' TeX output 2005.02.15:1340' -> lily-1009715145.eps
> kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000
> --dpi 8000
> feta20
> mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 8000; ignoring mode.
> mktexpk: Can't guess mode for 8000 dpi devices.
> mktexpk: Use a config file, or update me.
> kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
> dvips: Font feta20 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
> dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
>
>
>
>
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/15
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/19
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/20
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21