[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc: basic color support
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: rfc: basic color support |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:14:49 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:13:54 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> > * I'd almost be tempted to either make a smob, or use a vector.
> Hmmm, I'll have to look more into smobs...
>
> > * don't forget about the svg and tex backends.
> Ok
>
> > * implementation seems fine.
> Great, but there is a irritating "bug": noteheads seems to be engraved
> pretty early in the process, so they are overwritten by other
> engravers (StaffSymbol). See attached pdf.
There's support for a layer property, but it could be that we've
reversed its meaning during the hacking process. Perhaps you can
investigate. The StaffSymbol of course should be at the bottom layer.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/16
- rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/16
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Juergen Reuter, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/18
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/18
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/18
- Re: rfc: basic color support,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17