[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:25:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 |
I don't really follow the argument here. The most convenient situation
is of course when tetex-3 has already been installed when ec-fonts is,
since then the installation script for ec-fonts can call updmap in the
existing tetex.
In fact, I would propose a dependency such that ec-fonts is always
installed after tetex-*, also since the font itself doesn't make sense
without tetex.
The problem is for users who have tetex-2 installed, then install
ec-fonts (which runs updmap on tetex-2) and after that upgrade to
tetex-3. An ugly workaround would be to make separate packages of
ec-fonts for tetex-2 and tetex-3. They could have exactly the same
contents, the point is just to be able to invoke the installation
script of ec-fonts after the installation of tetex-3.
I still don't see any reason to involve anything related to ec-fonts
in the installation scripts for LilyPond.
/Mats
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Bertalan Fodor writes:
So, the new lilypond must contain the updmap also for
ec-fonts-mftraced. This is a must, since ec-fonts doesn't rely on
tetex, so tetex-3 may be installed before ec-fonts.
Hmm, ok.
Because tetex-3.0 will break existing lilypond, we must release
tetex-3.0 for cygwin at the same time with lilypond-2.4.3 and
ec-fonts-mftraced.
Yes. I've added removal of /var/lib/texmf to the post-texmf.sh
script, so I can send an update notice right after you lilypond with
tetex-3.0 fixes is installed in Cywgin.
Jan.
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, (continued)
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/19
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/20
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/26