|
From: | Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: | Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog ./darwin.patch Documentati... |
Date: | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:35:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) |
Graham Percival wrote:
Is this really correct? #(define ... ) defines the Scheme function. #(nopc) runs it. Is \nopc just another syntax for #(nopc) ?Er, I confess that I have no idea. I was trying to summarize the "Defining shortcuts for scheme code", since it looked like useful information. But on second glance, it looks like Han-Wen's solution involved calling it with #(nopc), while Erik's solution had a different definition but was called with \nopc.
Erik's solution is the neater one, although Scheme buffs might prefer mine. Erik's solution
\nopcmakes a music function. Normally, a music function takes a music argument, like \compressMusic, but Erik's doesn't take any.
My solution just directly calls the Scheme nopc function. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |