lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: music definition change in 2.9.9 or thereabouts?


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: music definition change in 2.9.9 or thereabouts?
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:41:37 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614)

Erik Sandberg schreef:
On Monday 26 June 2006 16:49, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On 6/26/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
Erik Sandberg schreef:
I guess this is an academic music representation issue: Do you think
that there is a fundamental difference (non-syntactically) between
events with postfix syntax, and other events?
No, and that's why I oppose to adding 'post-event as a music class.
One easy solution for now would be to let identifier_init wrap events
in chords when needed. In a future solution, I think it would be
sensible to represent all post-events directly as stream events; that
would clean up cases such as NoteEvent, where one [stream]event can
contain a list of [post]events.

.. and here's a patch. May I apply?

How's the complete picture now? (reg test compiles etc.?) I had rather not see that we discover another syntax body in a broomcloset.

--

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]