Re: pure simple-closures

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Joe Neeman escreveu:
> On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Joe Neeman schreef:
> > > On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > > Joe Neeman schreef:
> > > >
> > > > > Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to
> > > > > handle arbitrary length argument lists in scheme (the only way I
> > > > > currently know is to build the list of arguments, cons in the function
> > > > I think you're looking for the apply function,
> > > >
> > > >    (apply func arg-list)
> > > Ah yes, that's much better. So did you want me to put call_pure_function
> > > in scheme?
> > yes, I think so. The most important thing is that subsystems should not 
> > cross the C++/Scheme divide all too often. Since most of the func->pure 
> >   -func code is in Scheme, I think it's best we keep improvements there.
>
> How's this one? I also changed from using SCM_UNDEFINED to
> SCM_UNSPECIFIED so I could restore grob-closure.cc and added
> pure-outside-slur-callback.

as a completely unrelated remark: I just realized that simple-closure is 
probably an incorrect name. How about simple-curry?

--

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com