[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:15:46 +0100 (CET) |
> >>> I+J -> IJ, i + j->ij
> >>>
> >>> I think those two should be removed also (just think of
> >>> Strawinskij).
> >>
> >> No, those are language dependent (i + j -> ij is done in Dutch)
> >
> > Hmm. First of all, the default versions of the URW fonts don't
> > have a ligature for that, only that buggy bundle which also
> > contains the T + M ligature. Second, I'm not aware how to select
> > a language for a text string within lilypond so that typographical
> > features (from OpenType) for that language are used...
>
> so, we should figure out how to do that. There is a en_US setting
> somewhere in pango-font.cc, I believe.
Yep. The question is which kind of interface we should implement.
With `we' I mean `you', of course :-) My knowledge of the Pango
library is virtually nonexistent.
I can add the I+J->IJ stuff for OpenType script `latn', language
`NLD ' (Dutch), if you want me to do that. Similarly, I can disable
the f+i->fi stuff for languages `TRK ' (Turkish) and `PTG '
(Portuguese) -- I'm not sure about the latter, however.
Werner
- replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/15
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/16
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/16
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/17
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/29
- Re: replacement for pfx2ttf.fontforge, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/29