[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
skyline vs. y-aligned-side
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
skyline vs. y-aligned-side |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:30:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Hello Joe,
2 questions
1. do you see any reason to use
ly:side-position-interface::y-aligned-side
for Y-offset callbacks on stuff that uses outside-staff-priority?
If not: we could scrap that, as well as all the code necessary to
create the side-support-elements information for those grobs.
2. it would be cool if it were possible to position several grobs as a
single outline. Right now, we use DynamicLineSpanner to ensure that
all related dynamics stay on one Y position, but I suspect that it
should be possible to use the outside-staff-prority stuff to do that.
Do you think you could pull that off? Of course, the grobs will be marked
so that it is possible to distinguish related groups of dynamics.
The same holds for piano pedals. If we could do this, this would simplify
dynamics-engraver a lot, and we could scrap piano-pedal-align-engraver.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- skyline vs. y-aligned-side,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=