David Rogers wrote:
> The correct answer is (I believe) exactly as you proposed earlier. Talking
about Lilypond's internal logic is IMHO counterproductive. In fact, internally, I
suspect Lilypond should stay the same - it just needs to allow the user to use it
effectively by making (or even just *allowing*) the logical separation between
paper, headers, and music, which you already outlined.
It would be great if we could also leave the current mechanism in place
if we do such a change. The system made sense to me from the beginning
and I'd prefer to think in terms of scope (I have a strong programming
background). I don't oppose a division on its merits, but it would be
nice if the format would stay the same.