[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
More thoughts on chromatic staffs scheme vs C++
From: |
Kevin Dalley |
Subject: |
More thoughts on chromatic staffs scheme vs C++ |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:04:25 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) |
I recently submitted a patch to allow chromatic staffs. I added a
value to Note_heads_engraver to chose staff-line-layout from a
LilyPond file. I submitted a semitone layout, and I'm trying 2 others
in private, before deciding whether they should be submitted.
Each of these has a very small amount of C++ code, and takes an
argument of a pitch to return the position on the staff line.
However, I'm starting to wonder whether a scheme function would be
better. After reading the discussion on center-aligning, I think that
using a scheme function would be straightforward, and make
modifications easier. It looks like everything I need is available in
scheme.
Does this approach sound reasonable?
Of course, I have a few people who want to try out the chromatic
staffs. Further delay will be disappointing, but this is probably
easy to add, and submit.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- More thoughts on chromatic staffs scheme vs C++,
Kevin Dalley <=