|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: Git strategy for GDP |
Date: | Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:13:03 +0200 |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5) |
Quoting Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
John Mandereau wrote:1) We keep both branches independent, and we'll rebase lilypond/gdp on top of master after stable/2.12 has been derived from master. This will require reverting in master some translations and possible doc fixes that were/will be committed to both master and lilypond/gdp, just before rebasing.There are no doc fixes going into master, and I plan on keeping it that way until 2.12 is out.
That's important news for people like me, who occasionally keep fixing small things in the documentation. Should I instead do that in your gdp branch? /Mats
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |