[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
line-width in lilypond-book differs in manual vs. glossary
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
line-width in lilypond-book differs in manual vs. glossary |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:40:25 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070607) |
Examples from the user manual with [quote, ragged-right] produce this:
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
line-width = 160\mm - 2.0 * 0.4\in
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0\mm
force-assignment = #""
line-width = #(- line-width (* mm 3.000000))
}
Examples from the glossary with [quote, ragged-right] produce this:
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
line-width = 5\in - 2.0 * 0.4\in
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0\mm
force-assignment = #""
line-width = #(- line-width (* mm 3.000000))
}
Does anybody know why, or how to fix this? I have a slight preference
for 160\mm, but it doesn't really matter which one we pick, just as long
as they're the same.
I couldn't find "5\in" anywhere in Documentation/user/. Where else
should I look?
Cheers,
- Graham
- line-width in lilypond-book differs in manual vs. glossary,
Graham Percival <=