[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Leaving: replacements
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Leaving: replacements |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jan 2008 00:28:38 -0800 |
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:49:00 -0700
Paul Scott <address@hidden> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > If you want to jump into the technical side of things, see
> > "advanced-tech.txt" (or perhaps you have already done this). To
> > get an introduction to the non-technical side of the job, I
> > recommend editing one of the unclaimed sections of NR1. (see
> > "current.txt") "Text" has not been touched yet, while "Pitches"
> > is almost perfect. Are you familiar with texinfo?
> >
> My main career was as a programmer. Given that I am concerned about
> the time it would take to learn how someone else's code works well
> enough to be able to help there.
Quite reasonable.
> In light of your last email I would be willing to try to work on
> writing/revising a section of the doc's that needs work if it's
> something I have enough knowledge of.
Ok; NR 1 Pitches is the most urgent thing at the moment. Or
perhaps "urgent" isn't the right word... I'd just really like to
have one "perfect" section, so that in the future I can point back
to it.
Once you've finished reviewing Pitches (more for content than
presentation), we'll see which sections are currently not being
worked on. We're only doing NR 1 at the moment, and we'll
probably have two or three unclaimed sections.
Cheers,
- Graham