[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lilypond-book: relative should imply fragment
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
lilypond-book: relative should imply fragment |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:04:11 -0700 |
Could we get
[relative=x]
to automatically imply
[fragment]
? I can't imagine any possible use of [relative] where you don't
want [fragment], and this would simplify the doc source by almost
entirely omitting [fragment].
Cheers,
- Graham
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- lilypond-book: relative should imply fragment,
Graham Percival <=