Re: referencences for XXX

[Trevor Daniels]

I like the brief descriptions and refs as a bulleted list.  "Perfect" might 
be going too far, but it looks pretty good :)

The question to ask now is, is this list of refs complete - does it contain 
pointers to everything (fairly) specific to keyboards which a keyboard 
typesetter might need?  But getting the balance right is tricky, since 
otherwise we'd be adding references to everything from everywhere.  I think 
what you've done is pretty close to what we need. Even so, I'd like to see a 
ref to PianoStaff, and maybe to writing multiple voices, which are essential 
for and fairly specific to keyboard music.  Maybe a ref to 1.6.1.2 Grouping 
staves would cover both these.

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "lily-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 4:32 AM
Subject: NR 2: referencences for XXX


> Here's a sample "References for XXX", from NR 2.2.1.1:
>
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/References-for-keyboards.html
>
> - does this look perfect?  (the style, not the actual contents...
>  although if you see any problem with the content, we wouldn't
> mind hearing abou that)
>
> - should anything change?
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel