Re: LM 1.2 About the docs

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:17:23 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:42 PM
> 
> > If we hadn't used "fundamental" already, I might suggest that.
> > "Basic notation" implies easy stuff, not to mention the fact that
> > it was used as such in the 2.10 docs.
> 
> We'll have to find something - the section is certainly
> not Input syntax!
> 
> How about
> 
> Further notation
> General notation
> Non-musical notation

Well, it /was/ called "non-musical notation" before we started
GDP.  I'm not saying that we can't go back to it, though.

I'd say either "General notation" or "Non-musical notation",
leaning slightly towards the former.  Anybody else have thoughts
on this?

Cheers,
- Graham