[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:10:26 -0300 |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Below is my patch of feta-banier.mf.
>>
>> While I don't strictly oppose to adding new glyphs, I am wondering
>> why you are creating them. It would be more flexible to have a new
>> function to do this, since you can vary thickness and slant
>> dynamically.
>
> I don't oppose. However, I can program MF, but I have problems to do
> such things in Scheme.
Lookup::round_filled_polygon() will setup the required scheme code if
called from C++.
Probably, we'd need to transform Stem::flag() into a Scheme callback
to be able to override it.
> Please have a look at issue #652 also.
I did, but I have trouble imagining the pipeline you propose, as well
as how the cost-benefit tradeoff could ever be worth the trouble.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- [PATCH] Re: Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/21
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: not-so-ancient flags, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/22
- Message not available
- [final PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/29
- Re: [final PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/29
- Re: [final PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/30
- Re: [final PATCH] Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/08/30