[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Separate git branch for documentation
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Separate git branch for documentation |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:39:45 -0700 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:58:37 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > If we start adding a lot of (occasional) contributors, I propose we
> > use the git.or.cz fork mechanism. People can then publish their
> > changes, and it's easy for the maintainers to pull/cherry-pick
> > thoses.
>
> I believe Graham was just talking about adding myself and Jonathan, if
> I remember correctly.
That's correct. I don't think this qualifies as "a lot".
If we're really lucky, there /might/ be one or two new doc people
who contribute enough to warrant git access in the next year. But
if we have half a dozen "doc team" people, all with git access,
it'll be a lot easier to find somebody to push good patches from
non-git contributors.
Cheers,
- Graham