[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making texi2html optional?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Making texi2html optional? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:32:41 +0100 |
+1.
I really want 2.12 to have the sexy new look. Adding 500k (estimated)
to git for a few months is definitely worth it.
Cheers,
- Graham
On 8/29/08, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> How large is texi2html? Would it make sense to put the script into
> buildscripts/ until the correct version is released?
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:52 AM, John Mandereau
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm afraid we might wait a release of texi2html for a while (several
>> weeks). We can't require texi2html in Lily 2.12 if it hasn't been
>> officially released; OTOH Reinhold has put a lot of effort into using
>> texi2html for building our docs, so we really should release 2.12. HTML
>> documentation compiled with texi2html, and thus one or two 2.11.x
>> releases for testing. That's why I suggest to make texi2html optional
>> in configure script, and write conditional make rules for building HTML
>> docs -- the rules would be defined conditionnally like
>>
>> ifeq (,$(findstring texi2html,$(MISSING_OPTIONAL)))
>> # rules using texi2html
>> else
>> # rules using makeinfo
>> endif
>>
>> Then we could immediately merge dev/texi2html into master. I can
>> provide a patch prior to pushing if you like, but I think it's not too
>> much of a burden: only texinfo-rules.make and doc-i18n-user-rules.make
>> would be affected besides configure.in.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>