|
From: | Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: | Re: shorthand for autoBeam control |
Date: | Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:21:26 +0200 (CEST) |
> > My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite > > convenient: > > > > c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8 > > This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a > reader I would find your example much harder to read/sightread than > > c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8 > or > c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8] Yes. What I really would like to write is c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16[] } c8 and I just demonstrated a case where my proposed notation would be helpful. Werner
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |