[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: KeyboardStaff?
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: KeyboardStaff? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:48:56 -0700 |
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 00:21 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I agree with Valentin. I think it makes sense to
> just get rid of PianoStaff. Semantically, it's
> redundant; and removing an entire context would
> simplify the learning process for newbies, among
> other things.
Is keeping one extra context definition around such a learning barrier?
PianoStaff could be useful in the future: if I ever get around to fixing
the vertical spacing (ok, let's be more optimistic: when I get around to
fixing the vertical spacing) then PianoStaff could have presets to make,
for example, centred dynamics easier. Basically, I'm in favour of
keeping high-level semantic distinctions around in case they turn out to
be useful.
Joe
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, (continued)
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Francisco Vila, 2008/10/06
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/06
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Mark Polesky, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, David Kastrup, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Graham Percival, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Graham Percival, 2008/10/08
Re: KeyboardStaff?,
Joe Neeman <=