[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Fix naming of two Scheme type predicates
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Fix naming of two Scheme type predicates |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:43:28 -0800 |
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 12/30/08 7:10 PM, "Patrick McCarty" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> * Two exported Scheme functions did not follow the
>> naming convention for type predicates. This patch
>> fixes the issue.
>
> Have you checked to see whether the exported functions are
> used anywhere in the scheme code base?
Yes, I have. They are not used anywhere. `listener' is used in
scm/part-combiner.scm, but only as a local variable.
> Also, this probably requires a convert-ly rule, because
> user code could have included the dispatcher predicate
> instead of ly:dispatcher?.
That's true. It's unlikely, since AFACIS, the dispatcher/listener
stuff in mostly implemented on the C++ side, but since these
predicates were documented, we should probably have a convert-ly rule.
> And if it does require a convert-ly rule, it would have
> to wait until 2.13.
Okay, then I'll keep the patch on hold for a while.
Thanks,
Patrick