Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 05:41:21PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> 
> On 2/28/09 3:43 PM, "John Mandereau" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Carl,
> > Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
> >> So, just for the record, I guess that the appropriate way to handle this
> >> would be to:
> >> 
> >> 1.  Search through input/lsr for relevant files.
> >> 2.  Fix the snippet to make sure it compiles properly.
> >> 3.  Copy the snippet to input/new
> >> 4.  Delete the snippet from input/lsr
> >> 
> > Yes, except you shouldn't do 4, and don't forget some snippets
> > eventually come from LSR, not from input/new.
> 
> We can't do anything about the snippets that come from LSR, can we?  They're
> for the old release, so they can't be updated, IIUC.
> 
> I thought that was why we had input/new, to handle snippets that had changed
> syntax from the currently-running LSR.

Yes.  Files from input/new/ overwrite files from input/lsr/ (if
they have exactly the same filename, of course).

Cheers,
- Graham