Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> ok.  IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
>> suggested in AU 2.something.  Then you wouldn't need that special
>> path-to-binary thing.  But adding this as-is certainly can't hurt
>> the next person doing the update, so that's fine.
>
> Yeah, I almost took the OSX PATH out. I used to put it in all of my lily 
> shell scripts before I figured out that it's better to set things up as 
> described in AU. Since you lean that direction I wouldn't mind removing 
> it. Do you want me to make a patch or would you rather do it yourself?

I did it, but now I'm wondering how the script worked at all --
doesn't the lsr tarball put things in separate dirs?  Oh wait;
maybe the snippets-all has everything in one dir.  Ok, never mind.

Cheers,
- Graham