Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Please don't extend the syntax lightly.   Try to make something based
on music functions or \tweak first; if it finds wide spread adoption,
you can always add cute syntax later.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Neil Puttock<address@hidden> wrote:
> 2009/6/16 Mark Polesky <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Something like 'suppress-accidental that would fit right where
>> 'force-accidental goes in the scheme expression. Is that
>> possible? Would it be difficult to implement?
>
> It's quite simple to do.
>
> Attached is a patch which uses an ampersand to hide accidentals.




-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen