Re: improving cheatsheet appearance

[Graham Percival]

Thanks, applied.  I ended up using
\hideNotes
c128

for the key signature example; it works, and that's simpler than
messing with the @lilypond[] options.

Cheers,
- Graham

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:25:36PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> 
> In cheatsheet.itely
> 
> I propose changing line 70 (in "time signature") from
> \override Staff.Clef #'transparent = ##t
> to
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = #empty-stencil
> 
> Also, in "key signature" (lines 95-102), 
> the auto-generated \paper block is
> 
> \paper {
>   #(define dump-extents #t)
> 
>   indent = 0\mm
>   ragged-right = ##t
>   force-assignment = #""
>   line-width = #(- line-width (* mm  3.000000))
> }
> but looks better as 
> 
> \paper {
>   #(define dump-extents #t)
>   
>   indent = 0\mm
>   left-margin = 20\mm
>   ragged-right = ##f
>   force-assignment = #""
>   line-width = 15\mm
> }
> 
> But, of course, I read this in the CG:
> If you are making an
> example demonstrating special
> \paper{} values, contact the
> Documentation Editor. 
> 
> So, I'll leave it at that. If someone wants to make
> these changes, I think the cheatsheet will look 
> nicer. I can patch a change for the first one, but
> I don't know how to touch the auto-generated \paper
> code for the second one.
> 
> HTH
> - Mark
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel