Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical

[Mark Polesky]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Polesky <address@hidden>
> To: Patrick McCarty <address@hidden>; Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> Cc: lilypond-devel <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:08:52 PM
> Subject: Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical
> 
> 
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order
> > they are in.  Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related"
> > grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the
> > comment.
> > 
> > Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob 
> alist.

I prefer case-insensitive so X-offset and Y-offset are near
the bottom (where I expect to find them). Let me know if
you object.
- Mark