[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this possibly a bug?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Is this possibly a bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:07:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> writes:
> 2009/7/30 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> But if the key signature is, say, G major, then a note f would be
>> printed with a natural accidental. So "this rule never prints any
>> naturals" would appear wrong to me.
>
> While the part you quoted is obviously wrong, I think the full
> sentence is clear:
> "Unlike `dodecaphonic', this rule never prints any naturals. "
Huh? The behavior is unlike `dodecaphonic', but that does not make the
second part right.
"this rule never prints accidentals consistent with the key signature"
or "this rule only ever prints accidentals deviating from/inconsistent
with the key signature".
--
David Kastrup