[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:58:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:00:40PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 01:12 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Fair enough -- but could you add a post-build rule to rename
> > general.info/pdf/html to lilypond.info/pdf/html ?
>
> Not worth the effort. DIY if you like.
Hmm, I suppose this would screw up the cross-references. Mao, I
see why you don't want to do it. I guess we'll just expect users
looking at a pdf tarball to open up "general.pdf" first.
More importantly, this screws up the "info lilypond" idea.
... just a moment. *why* do we have a lilypond/ info dir being
created? Isn't that just because notation.tely contains
@setfilename lilypond.info
(IIRC)? Changing that should surely remove this weird lilypond/
dir, letting us renaming general.texi to lilypond.texi.
> > I ran into problems with score line-width vs. complete paper
> > width. In particular, it was the Vocal music example.
>
> I assume knowing/fixing the paper width is easy, isn't it?
That's what I told Jonathan, but when I tried to make it work with
aucun.ly, it didn't. Feel free to investigate and potentially
file bug reports.
As far as I was concerned, since I'd already made a fool out of
myself for not getting it to work after two hours (after chiding
him for an "ugly" solution), and Jonathan already had a working
makefile that gave us the desired formatting, I went with his
makefile.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/02
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Francisco Vila, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/08/08
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/08