|
From: | Trevor Daniels |
Subject: | Re: getting source with git |
Date: | Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:04:07 +0100 |
Patrick McCarty wrote Saturday, August 08, 2009 5:33 PM
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:50AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:A few people talked about browsing the history, which surprised me. Whenever I want to look at history, I use the web gitinterface. But evidently other people don't share my pathologicalhatred of git, so I guess that "availability of history" is a non-insignificant factor.I actually like git. :-)
So do I, although only after I understood it :) Git's history searching (or rather gitk's) is more functional, finding commits which added or removed a string, for example. Trevor
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |