Re: alternatives not taken into account in automatic accidentals

[Dan Eble]

On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:

> Dan Eble wrote:
> > I appreciate your reply.  Applying this statement to certain
> > other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug.
> > Does a non-functional bar line differ from those?
>
> I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures. This is a
> specific behavior of the \bar command.

OK, but what I was trying to ask is, is it a *correct* behavior of the  
\bar command? Saying that something is so differs from saying that it  
should be so.

> I'll try to look at this at some point.
> - Mark

Thanks,
--
Dan