[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:11:44 +0200 (CEST) |
>> After all, it is very easy to place the markup where you want it by
>> simply using two spacer notes:
>>
>> foo = {
>> s1
>> \time 7/8 s8^"foobar" s8*6
>> \time 10/8
>> }
>
> OK, I haven't thought of that solution, thanks. This should perhaps
> be added to the documentation.
There is a serious drawback of the above solution: If `skipbars=##t',
you must write e.g. `s1*3' to get a three-bar multi-measure rest in
constructions like `<< { ... } {... } >>'. Replacing it with `s4
s2. s1*2' gives a different result...
A possible solution (and maybe even a good one regardless of the
specific problem) is to make `skipbars' ignore the structure of skip
rests, always accumulating them to the maximum value.
Werner
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, (continued)
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/23
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/24
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/24
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/24
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Graham Percival, 2009/08/24
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/25
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/25
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/24
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/25
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/25
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/28