[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: output-distance.py
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: output-distance.py |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:51:02 +0100 |
2009/9/28 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> Doing the comparisons would be tricky; you'd need to fix
> lilypond-book, then use the new lilypond-book to generate the
> tests for the old version of lilypond, etc.
Seriously, it's not that difficult, since the changes I made follow
2.13.2: it's just a matter of squashing the two commits into one, then
applying it before running `make check'.
I definitely think a comparison between 2.13.3 & 2.13.4 is desirable,
considering how extensive the changes were.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: output-distance.py, (continued)
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py, Patrick McCarty, 2009/09/30
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/30
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/29
- Re: output-distance.py,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: output-distance.py, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/29
Re: output-distance.py, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2009/09/30