Re: Moving input/regression to tests/ ?

[Patrick McCarty]

On 2009-10-06, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > This is an idea for the far-off future, but IMO it would be nice to
> > see input/regression migrate to a new tests/ directory that looks
> > something like this:
> 
> Well, yes, that's been planned for years.  However,
> - it's going to wait until GUB is stabilized.

OK.

> - it's going to wait until a month after GUB is stabilized,
>   because I won't feel like playing with manually-creating
>   regtests or whatever for a while.

OK.

> - I'd rather call it regression/, since whenever I see
>   "tests" in a source tree, I never know if it's for random
>   screwing around (i.e. tests) or a serious part of
>   quality assurance (i.e. tests).

I'm okay with that.

Should we add a tracker issue for this, so we have it written down
somewhere?

-Patrick