[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Tracker 836:]
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: Tracker 836:] |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0000 |
2009/10/28 Ian Hulin <address@hidden>:
> I managed to get set up and put the patch for Tracker 836 on as tracker
> 141076.
This issue doesn't exist; did you delete it after uploading?
> Message:
> ly/engraver-init.ly in not part of this patch and I didn't change it.
You should apply your patch to master, then you won't get previous
commits showing up.
The way I normally do it is as follows:
-) create a patch which you want to upload
-) reset master branch (if necessary, pull any changes)
-) create a new branch for uploading to Rietveld
-) checkout new branch and apply patch
-) upload using `git cl upload origin'
> http://codereview.appspot.com/141076/diff/2001/2006#newcode144
> Line 144: (ly:parser-lookup parser 'book-filename))))
> Coding
> (book-filename))))
> here using the local variable caused an "invalid type" error from Scheme
Please read my suggestion again (and Carl's explanation).
> http://codereview.appspot.com/141076/diff/2001/2006#newcode154
> Line 154: (define-public current-outfile-name #f) ; for use by
> regression tests
> current-outfile-name was added to help write a regression test for this
> patch.
Don't keep us in suspense then; add the regression test to the patch
so we can review it. :)
There's one more bug with output-count. I suspect this line
(assoc-set! counter-alist output-suffix (1+ output-count)))
needs tweaking:
(assoc-set! counter-alist alist-key (1+ output-count)))
Cheers,
Neil