[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:00:14 +0200 |
2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
> right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
> fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>
> Bug squad: if you're verifying an issue and it wasn't fixed, change
> the fixed_2_13_18 to fixed_2_13_19 and test it once that's out. I'll
> do 2.13.19 early next week.
Fix to 1027 was one of the repeated commits, but did I remove it from
master? I think not, only copied them to lilypond/translation, so
maybe 1027 not being included in _18 has nothing to do with me.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Graham Percival, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything,
Francisco Vila <=