[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:19:15 +0100 |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 4/26/10 10:21 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I object to the scheme indentation -- to the extent that we have a
>> standard for lilypond input files (which isn't much), we follow
>> normal scheme indentation.
>
> The new patch actually follows normal Scheme indentation, where the previous
> examples didn't.
Really? Oops, sorry. I just assumed that all the really old stuff
would have been auto-formatted by emacs and would be correct.
Sorry,
- Graham
- PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/25
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Graham Percival, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material.,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Nicolas Sceaux, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Mark Polesky, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/27
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material., Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/27