[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: order of engravers
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: order of engravers |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:56:36 +0100 |
On 28 April 2010 13:36, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me what's going on here, and why the comments in IR
> appear to suggest the opposite of what's actually happening?
The comment is obsolete: defaultBarType isn't set by any engraver
(it's a user override), so there are no dependency issues concerning
its use.
Default_bar_line_engraver must follow Timing_translator since the
latter is responsible for setting measurePosition at the start of
every timestep. Naturally, this is rather important for automatic
barlines, since they should only appear when measurePosition =
ZERO_MOMENT.
Cheers,
Neil
- order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/27
- Re: order of engravers, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Neil Puttock, 2010/04/28
Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28