[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2010 15:42:12 -0600 |
On 5/4/10 11:19 AM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on
>> input files would be good. I think bar checks are at
>> least as important as a \version statement, which is
>> mentioned there.
>
> I think a better place would be in a new @subsection at the
> top of 2.1 "Single staff notation", just before 2.1.1
> "Accidentals and key signatures". Here's my proposed text:
This looks good to me.
Carl
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Graham Percival, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Graham Percival, 2010/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Mark Polesky, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., James Lowe, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Mark Polesky, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., James Lowe, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., James Lowe, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Mark Polesky, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Graham Percival, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Graham Percival, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Mark Polesky, 2010/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code., Mats Bengtsson, 2010/05/06