[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Great Experience!
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Great Experience! |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2010 01:38:42 -0300 |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm a singer in the Wiener Singakademie[1] and two weeks from now we have a
> tour to Italy[2]. We'll be singing among others a little known piece by
> Torelli, for which we were told that the score would have to be typeset for us
> because it has never been published.
>
> So, today was our first rehearsal, and when we got the score I expected the
> worst, having seen other newly typeset scores with other applications. But:
> The score that we got looked just perfect -- not only professional, but really
> perfect and ready for printing by any publishing house.
>
> I got really jealous how any other notation software could produce so good-
> looking scores.
> The figured bass looked exactly like lilypond, but judging from the lyrics
> font and the position of the tempo markings, it didn't look like LilyPond,
> which made me even more jealous...
Was the music font lily's feta font? The G-clef is a give-away,
because Feta's is quite unlike any other G-clef.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen