[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Critical issues
From: |
Karl Hammar |
Subject: |
Re: Critical issues |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2010 10:06:45 +0200 (CEST) |
Issue 881: Arpeggios may collide with laissezVibrer ties
According to the bug tracker, v2.11.19's output is what to aim for.
Neil gave the fix:
(define-public (laissez-vibrer::print grob)
(ly:tie::print grob))
(then add laissez-vibrer::print to pure-print-callbacks)
But he has not done a regtest check.
///
How do one do a regtest?
I remember there were discussion about this a while ago, but doing a
quick search (regtest check lilypond) did not turn up anything useful,
except [1] and [2].
[1]
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/checking-and-verifying-issues
[2] http://lilypond.org/test/
Perhaps it should be documented, maybe it already are.
Doing "info ./Documentation/out/lilypond-contributor.info-1" I find:
8.1 Introduction to regression tests
The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make'
targets. The output of the regression tests is also automatically
So, what targets?
The targets test* seems to have something with the regression directory
to do, but I don't understand how to do a comparision to a known good set.
. Do we have a known good set?
. If so, how do I compare current output with it?
Regards,
/Karl
- Critical issues, Karl Hammar, 2010/05/12
- Re: Critical issues, Joe Neeman, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues,
Karl Hammar <=
- Re: Critical issues, Graham Percival, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Karl Hammar, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Graham Percival, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Karl Hammar, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Karl Hammar, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/13
- Re: Critical issues, Karl Hammar, 2010/05/14
- Re: Critical issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/14