[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 100+ warnings and some cosmetics along the way (issue1724041)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 100+ warnings and some cosmetics along the way (issue1724041) |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:21:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Pap Lôrinc <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> (and I also think that too many preprocessor macros are used ... but
>> I'm no expert, please don't take my opinion as an insult). I
>
> What is 'too many' ? Which macros could we do without?
Arguably creating default class functions by calling a macro rather than
inheriting from a virtual base class is not making good use of C++
features.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: 100+ warnings and some cosmetics along the way (issue1724041), (continued)
Re: 100+ warnings and some cosmetics along the way (issue1724041), papuska, 2010/06/17