[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue
From: |
n . puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044) |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:23:32 +0000 |
On 2010/06/19 04:55:25, Carl wrote:
Both versions can be used, according to Ross. The reason we have 2/8
standing
alone is to prevent 2/8, 3/8, and 4/8 from being beamed together in
3/4 time,
where that would be an error.
I don't consider that an error; it's traditional typesetting style. :)
Were you referring to the reg tests, or to some other files? If it's
other
files, could you please send me a copy?
It was from the regtests, but it looks like you've fixed it now (grace
notes breaking the previous beam).
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1667044/show
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), (continued)
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/16
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/16
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/19
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/19
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044),
n . puttock <=
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/22
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/22
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/27